Skip to main content
Fig. 2 | Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Fig. 2

From: Cost-effectiveness analysis of overground robotic training versus conventional locomotor training in people with spinal cord injury

Fig. 2

Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve of locomotor strategies (conventional and overground robotic) in people with incomplete spinal cord injury (A) and complete spinal cord injury (B). The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve presents the percentage of simulations where each strategy is most cost-effective at different levels of willingness to pay (WTP) for an additional quality adjusted life year (QALY)

Back to article page