Skip to main content

Table I Subject information

From: Can a powered knee-ankle prosthesis improve weight-bearing symmetry during stand-to-sit transitions in individuals with above-knee amputations?

Subject Code

Sex

Age [years]

Weight [kg]

Height [m]

Age of Amputation [years]

Amputation Side

Reason for Amputation

Previous Experience with Utah Bionic Leg

Passive Knee Prosthesis

Passive Ankle Prosthesis

Socket Suspension

Used hands during sit-down

Desired peak knee extension torque [Nm/kg]

TF01

M

64

88.64

1.880

5

L

Trauma

N

Rheo

Proflex XC

Vacuum

N

0.3

TF02

M

52

102.27

1.905

13

L

Trauma

Y*

C-Leg

Triton

Pin Lock

N

0.2

TF03

M

29

65.14

1.778

8

R

Trauma

Y

Plie

All Pro

Suction

N

0.3

TF04

F

32

59.09

1.600

12

L

Trauma

Y*

Plie

All Pro

Lanyard

N

0.5

TF05

F

60

58.64

1.651

13

L

Trauma

N

C-Leg

Trias

Suction

N

0.2

TF06

M

40

90.45

1.905

35

L

Trauma

Y

Plie

Soleus

Suction

N

0.6

TF07

M

38

100.45

1.803

10

L

Trauma

N

C-Leg

All Pro

Suction

N

0.2

TF08

M

53

99.8

1.930

22

L

Trauma

N

C-Leg

Taleo

Suction

Y

0.4

TF09

F

26

68.18

1.753

7

R

Trauma

N

Plie

Proflex XC

Suction

Y

0.6

TF10

M

63

86.82

1.702

5

L

Dysvascular

Y

C-Leg

Kinterra F1

Lanyard

Y

0.15

  1. * asterisks = subject has used the previous version of the Utah Bionic leg, but had not used the current version before participating in this study