Table 1 Motor imagery BCI performance
From: Can vibrotactile stimulation and tDCS help inefficient BCI users?
Sham stimulation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
LOW | HIGH | |||
PRE | POST | PRE | POST | |
BCI performance (%) | 53.75 (43.75 ~ 60%) | 53.99 (43.75 ~ 61.25%) | 71.88 (63.75 ~ 95%) | 62.71 (47.5 ~ 85%) |
Vibrotactile stimulation | ||||
LOW | HIGH | |||
PRE | POST | PRE | POST | |
BCI performance (%) | 52.5 (47.5 ~ 60%) | 61.63 (46.25 ~ 76.25%) | 74.17 (65 ~ 78.75%) | 63.75 (50 ~ 75%) |
tDCS | ||||
LOW | HIGH | |||
PRE | POST | PRE | POST | |
BCI performance (%) | 51.12 (46.15 ~ 56.25%) | 56.25 (45 ~ 67.5%) | 75.11 (66.25 ~ 88.75%) | 63.44 (48.75 ~ 77.5%) |