Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Table 4 AIC and R² values of candidate models in validation experiments

From: Novel evaluation of upper-limb motor performance after stroke based on normal reaching movement model

Participants	AIC			R²
Participants	Fitts’	Almanji	Proposed	Fitts’	Almanji	Proposed
Healthy
H1	1551	− 914	− 288	0.605	0.999	0.798
H2	1558	− 924	− 329	0.612	0.999	0.79
H3	1623	− 908	− 357	0.678	0.999	0.928
H4	1630	− 840	− 295	0.58	0.999	0.856
H5	1555	− 977	− 477	0.859	0.999	0.974
H6	1454	− 906	− 373	0.803	0.999	0.92
H7	1579	− 941	− 330	0.577	0.999	0.847
H8	1580	− 908	− 308	0.707	0.999	0.873
H9	1417	− 937	− 402	0.718	0.999	0.855
H10	1379	− 934	− 398	0.797	0.999	0.903
H11	1557	− 736	− 341	0.66	0.999	0.854
H12	1450	− 972	− 408	0.782	0.999	0.908
Stroke: Less-affected
S1	1585	− 502	− 360	0.579	0.982	0.934
S2	1658	− 829	− 262	0.55	0.999	0.891
S3	1778	− 656	− 106	0.314	0.998	0.762
S4	1451	− 336	− 335	0.752	0.847	0.841
S5	1594	− 866	− 352	0.527	0.999	0.933
S6	1635	− 849	− 132	0.385	0.999	0.509
S7	1637	− 822	− 157	0.436	0.999	0.701
Stroke: Affected
S1	1743	− 756	− 208	0.513	0.999	0.846
S2	1882	− 733	3	0.143	0.999	0.509
S3	1757	− 664	9	0.186	0.999	0.444
S4	1558	− 441	− 253	0.227	0.972	0.846
S5	893	− 425	− 50	0.005	0.999	0.45
S6	1885	− 648	54	0.111	0.999	0.339
S7	1645	− 748	− 80	0.39	0.999	0.565

AIC denotes Akaike information criterion; R² denotes the coefficient of determination

Back to article page

ISSN: 1743-0003

Contact us

Submission enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com