Skip to main content
Fig. 1 | Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Fig. 1

From: Integration of proprioception in upper limb prostheses through non-invasive strategies: a review

Fig. 1

Graphic comparison between physiological and artificial transduction of proprioceptive information. The outer columns show how the function of the receptors in our body (left) could be emulated by some of the common sensors already available on the market (right). In prosthetics, the employed hardware dictates the strategies to be implemented (inner columns) and the input signal may differ from the one coded by the physiological receptor. For instance, the number of cycles of the motors extracted by rotary encoders is used instead of the muscle length, while the current to the motors may replace tendon tension, as an alternative to a tension sensor, which is less common and would need to be purposefully integrated into the device additionally

Back to article page