Skip to main content

Table 1 PEDro scores of the controlled-trial studies

From: Virtual reality applications based on instrumental activities of daily living (iADLs) for cognitive intervention in older adults: a systematic review

Study

Eligibility criteria

Random allocation

Concealed allocation

Baseline comparability

Subject blinding

Therapist blinding

Assessor blinding

 < 15% drop-out

Intention-to-treat analysis

Between group difference reported

Point estimate and variability reported

Total Pedro Score

Man et al. (2012) [59]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

6/10

Kang et al. (2021) [61]

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

0

1

1

6/10

Schreiber et al. (1999) [58]

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

7/10

Panerai et al. (2021) [64]

1

0

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

6/10

Hofmann et al. (2003) [69]

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

1

5/10

Yamaguchi et al. (2012) [51]

0

0

0

1

0

0

0

1

1

1

0

4/10

Gamito et al. (2020) [56]

1

1

0

1

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

8/10

Park et al. (2019) [63]

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

1

1

1

7/10

Park (2022) [62]

1

1

0

1

1

0

1

1

1

1

1

8/10

Optale et al. (2010) [70]

1

1

0

1

0

0

1

1

0

1

1

6/10

Tarnanas et al. (2014) [54]

1

1

0

1

0

1

1

1

0

0

1

6/10

Oliveira et al. (2021) [60]

1

1

0

1

0

0

0

1

0

1

1

5/10

Studies’ degree of compliance (%)

91.16

75

0

100

16.66

16.66

58.33

100

66.66

91.16

91.16

 
  1. A score of 1 indicates that the study satisfied a specific criterion, while a score of 0 indicates that the study did not meet that criterion. It is important to note that the eligibility criteria item is not included in the calculation of the total PEDro score. The degree of compliance with the criteria of the different studies is expressed as a percentage of the total number of studies