Skip to main content

Table 2 Personal metrics of all participants and comparison between the low-risk and at-risk groups according to two criteria: criteria I: according to any fall in the past 1 year, criteria II according to the TUG test

From: Fall risk classification with posturographic parameters in community-dwelling older adults: a machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence approach

 

Criteria I

Criteria II

 

Low risk (N = 166)

At risk (N = 49)

p value

Low risk (N = 149)

At risk (N = 66)

p value

Age

71.2 ± 7.3

72.6 ± 6.7

0.24

70.0 ± 6.6

75.3 ± 7.0

< 0.001

Male

53 (31.9%)

16 (32.7%)

0.92

49 (32.9%)

20 (33.3%)

0.71

Body height (cm)

156.9 ± 8.7

157.4 ± 8.5

0.76

158.2 ± 7.8

154.3 ± 9.7

0.002

Body weight (kg)

61.0 ± 12.5

62.3 ± 19.6

0.50

61.1 ± 12.1

61.7 ± 12.1

0.73

Body mass index (kg/m2)

24.7 ± 4.1

25.2 ± 4.2

0.40

24.3 ± 4.0

25.9 ± 4.1

0.01

Using walking aids

11 (6.6%)

8 (42.1%)

0.04

0 (0%)

19 (28.8%)

< 0.001

Timed-up-and-go time (seconds)

8.5 ± 2.9

9.0 ± 3.6

0.28

7.5 ± 1.1

12.8 ± 4.0

< 0.001

Fall history

      

 Any fall

–

–

–

21 (14.1%)

28 (42.4%)

< 0.001

 Multiple falls

–

–

–

3 (2.0%)

13 (19.7%)

 < 0.001