Skip to main content

Table 2 Usability attributes of the glossary with their proposed definitions and the average ± STD ratings obtained in the global validation

From: Towards a validated glossary of usability attributes for the evaluation of wearable robotic devices

Attribute

Proposed definition in the global validation survey

Agreement with the definition

Relevance in the field

Included as design criteria

Accessibility

The quality of being easily obtainable or reachable

4,00 ± 0,82

3,71 ± 1,21

2,71 ± 1,45

Adaptability

The ability of a system to change in order to suit different conditions

3,88 ± 1,45

4,13 ± 1,02

3,31 ± 1,35

Aesthetics

The extent to which a system's design is (visually) pleasing to the user

4,20 ± 0,95

3,45 ± 1,10

2,95 ± 1,15

Autonomy**

The capability of achieving a set goal within a defined scope without human interventions while adapting to operational and environmental conditions

3,83 ± 0,92

3,56 ± 1,20

2,94 ± 1,47

Cognitive load

The amount of mental effort required to perform a task

4,06 ± 1,34

4,12 ± 0,78

3,06 ± 1,14

Comfort*º

The extent to which the use of a system does not induce pain, unnecessary constraint or unpleasant feelings

4,33 ± 0,9

4,75 ± 0,58

4,31 ± 1,01

Compatibility*

The ability to work with other specific systems or environments without problems or conflict

4,20 ± 0,86

4,00 ± 1,03

3,00 ± 1,46

Complexity

The amount of effort needed to describe or use a system

3,71 ± 1,10

4,00 ± 1,00

3,56 ± 1,15

Cost-effectiveness

The degree to which something is effective or productive in relation to its cost

4,00 ± 1,32

3,65 ± 1,06

3,29 ± 1,26

Customizability

The ability to be modified to suit a particular individual, task, or environment

4,44 ± 1,03

4,13 ± 1,02

3,87 ± 1,19

Desirability*

The degree of how much a product is wanted by a user

4,27 ± 0,88

3,50 ± 1,21

2,69 ± 1,35

Durability

The ability to withstand wear, pressure, or damage

4,07 ± 1,00

3,93 ± 1,16

3,53 ± 1,60

Ease of use

The degree to which using a system is free of unnecessary effort

3,63 ± 1,15

4,33 ± 0,90

4,13 ± 0,99

Effectiveness

The accuracy and completeness with which users achieve specified goals

4,13 ± 1,15

4,63 ± 0,50

4,44 ± 0,81

Efficiency

The resources used in relation to the results achieved

4,26 ± 0,99

4,35 ± 0,81

3,95 ± 1,19

Embodiment

The perception of a beign part of the body-image as a feeling of ownership and agency

4,13 ± 1,15

3,44 ± 0,96

2,50 ± 0,82

Ergonomics

The degree of, or design for kinematic compatibility in a human–robot interface

3,06 ± 1,53

4,35 ± 1,06

3,76 ± 1,30

Error recovery

The quality of a system to allow the user to exit from a situation that the user did not intend to be in

4,24 ± 0,83

3,94 ± 1,20

2,63 ± 1,15

Feasibility

The determination as to whether assigned tasks could be accomplished by using the given resources

4,18 ± 0,88

3,94 ± 1,09

3,53 ± 1,37

Frustration

The feeling of being upset or annoyed as a result of being unable to change or achieve something

4,35 ± 0,79

3,59 ± 1,12

2,71 ± 1,53

Functionality*º

The extent to which the range of functions offered by a system can be used to perform the intended tasks

4,12 ± 0,86

4,56 ± 0,70

4,28 ± 0,89

Health benefit

The positive effect on a person's health gained from a system

4,53 ± 1,01

4,13 ± 1,26

3,44 ± 1,50

Helpfulness**

The ability of providing useful assistance

3,87 ± 1,3

4,00 ± 1,46

3,56 ± 1,63

Independence**

The ability to perform an activity with no or little help from others

4,53 ± 0,72

4,28 ± 1,07

3,72 ± 1,53

Intuitiveness*º

The extent to which a system is easy and natural to use, learnable and understandable

4,15 ± 0,93

4,30 ± 0,80

3,84 ± 0,90

Learnability

The ease and speed with which the users get familiar with the use of a system and retain these skills and knowledge

4,27 ± 0,88

4,14 ± 0,53

3,79 ± 0,97

Meet user needs*

The extent to which a system fulfills the design criteria given by the target user group

3,75 ± 1,18

4,63 ± 1,02

4,38 ± 0,96

Mobility*º

The ability to move in one's environment with ease and without restriction

4,47 ± 0,72

4,44 ± 0,70

4,17 ± 0,71

Motivation

The desire, or enthusiasm to do something (e.g. use a system or complete a task)

4,25 ± 0,85

3,75 ± 0,91

3,11 ± 1,10

Performance

The level of success in completing a task

4,24 ± 1,03

4,41 ± 0,62

4,35 ± 0,79

Physical workload

The amount and intensity of physical activity required to complete a task

4,16 ± 1,01

3,70 ± 1,08

3,60 ± 1,05

Pleasure*

A feeling of enjoyment or satisfaction, or something that produces this feeling

4,00 ± 0,69

2,94 ± 1,30

2,00 ± 1,08

Practicality*

The extent to being suitable for a particular occasion or use, or of being able to provide effective solutions to problems

3,61 ± 1,20

3,82 ± 0,88

3,41 ± 1,46

Quality of life

An individual's perception of their position in life in the context of the culture and value systems in which they live and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards and concerns

4,25 ± 1,07

4,10 ± 0,85

3,15 ± 1,14

Reliability*º

The extent to which a system will consistently perform its intended function adequately over time in a specific context of use

4,40 ± 0,75

4,70 ± 0,73

4,05 ± 1,00

Robustness

​The quality of being strong and unlikely to break or fail

3,95 ± 1,32

4,25 ± 0,97

3,95 ± 0,91

Safety*º

The extent to which the use of a system is free from danger or risk of injury

4,53 ± 0,51

4,76 ± 0,44

4,53 ± 1,01

Satisfaction

The extent to which the user's physical, cognitive and emotional responses that result from the use of a system meet the user’s needs and expectations

4,16 ± 1,01

4,50 ± 0,69

3,80 ± 1,06

Technical requirements*º

The set of technical design criteria required to deliver a desired function or behavior from a system to satisfy a user’s standards and needs

3,50 ± 1,51

3,13 ± 1,85

3,44 ± 1,50

Temporal demand

The amount of time required to complete a specific task using the system or in setting it up to be used

4,26 ± 0,99

4,21 ± 0,92

3,55 ± 1,05

Understandability**

The extent to which a system's functions and provided information are comprehensible

4,15 ± 0,99

3,79 ± 1,08

3,37 ± 1,30

Usefulness*º

The extent to which a system is effective in helping the user to do or achieve something in a practical way

4,47 ± 0,62

4,76 ± 0,56

4,24 ± 1,03

Wearability*º

The extent to which a WR can be mounted on the body and used without unnecessary movement restriction

3,88 ± 1,31

3,94 ± 0,97

4,69 ± 0,60

4,59 ± 0,87

4,13 ± 0,96

4,12 ± 1,17

  1. The * indicates the attributes that were evaluated with the survey of the local validation stage whereas the ones marked with º indicate those that were discussed within the focus group. Attributes marked with ** were initially considered for merging due to similarities in their definitions with other UA in the set. However, they were not merged as per the focus group's decision