A neural tracking and motor control approach to improve rehabilitation of upper limb movements
© Goffredo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 04 January 2008
Accepted: 05 February 2008
Published: 05 February 2008
Restoration of upper limb movements in subjects recovering from stroke is an essential keystone in rehabilitative practices. Rehabilitation of arm movements, in fact, is usually a far more difficult one as compared to that of lower extremities. For these reasons, researchers are developing new methods and technologies so that the rehabilitative process could be more accurate, rapid and easily accepted by the patient. This paper introduces the proof of concept for a new non-invasive FES-assisted rehabilitation system for the upper limb, called smartFES (sFES), where the electrical stimulation is controlled by a biologically inspired neural inverse dynamics model, fed by the kinematic information associated with the execution of a planar goal-oriented movement. More specifically, this work details two steps of the proposed system: an ad hoc markerless motion analysis algorithm for the estimation of kinematics, and a neural controller that drives a synthetic arm. The vision of the entire system is to acquire kinematics from the analysis of video sequences during planar arm movements and to use it together with a neural inverse dynamics model able to provide the patient with the electrical stimulation patterns needed to perform the movement with the assisted limb.
The markerless motion tracking system aims at localizing and monitoring the arm movement by tracking its silhouette. It uses a specifically designed motion estimation method, that we named Neural Snakes, which predicts the arm contour deformation as a first step for a silhouette extraction algorithm. The starting and ending points of the arm movement feed an Artificial Neural Controller, enclosing the muscular Hill's model, which solves the inverse dynamics to obtain the FES patterns needed to move a simulated arm from the starting point to the desired point. Both position error with respect to the requested arm trajectory and comparison between curvature factors have been calculated in order to determine the accuracy of the system.
The proposed method has been tested on real data acquired during the execution of planar goal-oriented arm movements. Main results concern the capability of the system to accurately recreate the movement task by providing a synthetic arm model with the stimulation patterns estimated by the inverse dynamics model. In the simulation of movements with a length of ± 20 cm, the model has shown an unbiased angular error, and a mean (absolute) position error of about 1.5 cm, thus confirming the ability of the system to reliably drive the model to the desired targets. Moreover, the curvature factors of the factual human movements and of the reconstructed ones are similar, thus encouraging future developments of the system in terms of reproducibility of the desired movements.
A novel FES-assisted rehabilitation system for the upper limb is presented and two parts of it have been designed and tested. The system includes a markerless motion estimation algorithm, and a biologically inspired neural controller that drives a biomechanical arm model and provides the stimulation patterns that, in a future development, could be used to drive a smart Functional Electrical Stimulation system (sFES). The system is envisioned to help in the rehabilitation of post stroke hemiparetic patients, by assisting the movement of the paretic upper limb, once trained with a set of movements performed by the therapist or in virtual reality. Future work will include the application and testing of the stimulation patterns in real conditions.
Rehabilitative practice in stroke survivors has strengthened its empirical foundation on the basis of the recent advances in neuroscience methods, which led to deeper understanding of motor control and learning mechanisms, also on the basis of the recent discoveries regarding cells injury and regeneration . In particular, long-term potentiation (i.e. where synapses are able to encode new information to represent a movement skill) is considered to have a key-role for the restoration of impaired functions. A critical element for the success of these mechanisms resides in the repetition of similar inputs for the motor cortex: these inputs, in fact, act as a biological teacher for the neuronal acquisition of novel skills. This process could be easily implemented through experience and training, which induce physiological and morphological plasticity, by strengthening synaptic connections between neurons encoding common functions . Thus, the key concept behind the neurological rehabilitation is the repetition of movements in a learning-by-examples paradigm: by repeating movements, in either passive or assisted way, the brain is exposed to reinforcement and the neurons strengthen their connections.
To accomplish this purpose, the restoration of motor functions in people recovering from cerebrovascular diseases is typically achieved by means of adaptive equipments and environmental modifications [3, 4]. Significant improvement is being made in understanding the cellular and molecular events of cell injury and regeneration, and the paradigm of the massive repetition of movements to strengthen functional outcome is a necessity thus forcing new clinical treatments to exploit these new discoveries [5–10].
Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) is one of the most used technologies for restoring the functions of patients affected by neurological pathologies. By electrically activating the muscular system, FES is increasingly recognised as therapy and treatment for subjects impaired by stroke, multiple sclerosis and cerebral palsy [11, 12]. The electrical stimulation has overcome the simple functional limb substitution , and has been proved as a successful therapy tool both in lower  and in upper limb movements . These encouraging results have recently brought to the development of FES-assisted rehabilitation programs for hemiplegic patients , thus disclosing the idea of functional electrical therapy, FET . Currently, FET systems make use of residual motor functions  or EMG recordings from muscular activity . Recent technologies include non-invasive stimulators, like the handmaster  and the bionic glove , but the presence of external devices does not appear desirable for patients with neurological injuries. Novel and more sophisticated technologies, able to convey FES-based rehabilitation programs in an automatic and non-invasive way, are thus needed.
Following this objective, a new non-invasive FES-assisted rehabilitation system for the upper limb is here presented: the electrical stimulation is controlled by a biologically inspired neural inverse dynamics model, fed by the kinematics associated with the execution of a planar goal-oriented movement. The system, called smartFES (sFES), exploits the recent neurological discoveries on the effect of the repetition of rehabilitation exercises for the recovery of motor functions in stroke survivors.
As a proof of concept, in the current paper only the markerless silhouette tracking algorithm and the neural controller for the execution of point to point planar movements of the upper limb will be presented. In fact, these steps are crucial in designing a system which could help patients in recovering movements through FES, because they estimate the movement and solve the inverse problem in terms of the pattern of stimulation needed for accomplishing the desired movement. For the HMI different approaches are possible, while the implementation of the FES stimulator is the next step in our research program.
The use of a markerless motion estimation method for controlling a FES-based rehabilitation exercise is a novelty in the research area. There is a rich literature on various human motion analysis techniques which estimate limb poses from video sequences for different purposes, like video surveillance , human-computer interaction , gesture recognition  and biomechanical applications . The approaches can be grouped in model-based and model-free methods (see  for a review). The first group uses human body models in order to estimate the limb poses from the video sequences. These approaches generally need more than one video camera capturing the movement of the entire body and present high computational costs. On the other hand, model-free methods rely on the motion estimation of single pixels belonging to the body limbs , or on the extraction of the body silhouette . The first approach is basically sensitive to noise and light changes, and needs an initialization phase for the selection of the pixels of interest. Conversely, the silhouette-based motion estimation appears a good compromise between computation time, automatism and robustness. Edge detectors  can be extracted robustly and at low cost, but they are unsuitable to deal with cluttered backgrounds or textured clothing. Therefore, silhouettes are usually located with contour or shape approaches that are more accurate than edge detecting techniques in tracking non-deformable objects [30, 31]. A recent optimization of the Snake algorithm , which allows to extract the silhouette of deformable objects, like human body limbs, had been proposed by the authors of this paper . The method, called Neural Snake, appears to be a sound choice for the sFES system where a trade-off between computation time and accuracy is needed.
The second block of the sFES system is a biologically inspired controller of the stimulation waveforms for the arm. Even though some pioneering work has been found in literature , a neural FES controller has not yet been deeply investigated. For this purpose, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), which have been firstly hypothesized as biologically reasonable controllers , are proven to be an efficient tool for the resolution of the inverse kinematics . The aim of the ANN is therefore to replace a controller activated step-by-step by the patient (for instance, with the contraction of residual muscles) with a high level motor controller driven by the action to be implemented (i.e. move the arm from position A to B, reach an object and so on) . For this purpose, after receiving the information regarding the desired movement, the stand alone neural controller drives the stimulator block to make the assisted arm move in the requested way. Therefore, the rehabilitation exercise will be composed of movements shown by a "healthy teaching arm" and reproduced by means of the neural driven sFES.
The markerless motion estimation method
The first step of the proposed sFES system is the markerless motion estimation of the healthy arm pose. For this purpose, silhouette approaches, like Active Contour Models (Snakes), offer a partial solution because they imply that the shape has to be preserved during the movement. However, in human movement analysis it is often needed to track silhouettes whose shape is largely changing from frame to frame, and dealing with this issue is increasingly more demanding in presence of low acquisition frame rates with respect to the velocity in the execution of movement. Therefore, in order to apply the Snake algorithm in the dynamic context, the present study introduces a new approach, called Neural Snakes (NS).
The algorithm is based on the design of a specific ANN (ANN1 in the following) which works in a two-steps basis: firstly, it predicts the deformation of the contour shape on a frame by frame basis, then this coarse estimation of the silhouette position is refined by means of the Snake algorithm described in . In this way, the NS algorithm is able to track the changes in the silhouette far better than the simple Snake algorithm.
The edge points are then used as contour points (CP) for the Snake algorithm where their matching to the image contour is achieved by minimizing a cost function, defined "energy". As explained in , the contour is a controlled discrete spline function that can be parametrically represented by a sequence of samples v(s):
v(s) = (x(s), y(s)) (1)
and where α and β are respectively the measure of elasticity and stiffness of the Snake. The first derivative term makes the Snake act like a membrane, where the constant α controls the tension along the contour. On the other hand, the constant β and the second order term drives the rigidity of the curve (if β is zero, the contour is discontinuous in its tangent, i.e. it may develop a corner at that point).
The external energy of the Snake, E ext , is derived from the image data to make the Snake be attracted to lines, edges and terminations:
E ext = E line + E edge + E term (4)
and f(x, y) is the image intensity, θ(x, y) is the gradient direction along the contour and n r is an unit vector perpendicular to the gradient direction.
The application of the described energy minimizing procedure on the N contour points extracted from the controlled video sequences generates the training set of the ANN1. The resulting horizontal and vertical positions of the contour points, together with their velocities and accelerations, are used to estimate the dynamics of shape.
Therefore, in an uncontrolled video sequence, the arm movement is firstly predicted by the trained ANN1 and then corrected with a fine estimation by using the Snake algorithm. For each frame i, the output of the predictor (the N predicted contour points) and the i-th frame of the video sequence are processed by the Snake algorithm in order to minimise eq. (2). The result is the silhouette pose estimation over time. Moreover, the CP positions obtained with the NS approach allow the estimation of elements characterizing the kinematics of the gesture, such as the position of the wrist as the end point, or the shoulder joint behaviour.
The NS had been previously tested on synthetic video sequences with different values of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)  in order to evaluate its accuracy: the results showed a RMSE lower than 1 cm and almost independent on the SNR. Moreover, comparative tests on real video sequences had shown the improvement of NS in tracking deformable shapes as compared to the Snake algorithm.
Therefore, the proposed markerless silhouette tracking algorithm can be confidently used for the estimation of the arm position, which drives, together with a HMI, the neural motor controller.
The neural controller of the upper limb model
The arm model is composed of two joints (two degrees of freedom) and four muscle-like actuators (agonist and antagonist pair for both shoulder and elbow joint), which execute the planar movement on the basis of the muscular activations. The skeletal structure of the simulated biomechanical arm consists of two segments, with lengths L1 and L2, which represent the forearm and the upper arm respectively, connected through two rotoidal joints. The planar joints that connect the two segments can assume angular values in the range [0, π]. These values are in correspondence with the Cartesian coordinates of the free end in the working plane by means of well known direct kinematic transformation. The muscular structure is simulated by means of four Hill's type muscle-like actuators, and establishes the dynamic relationship between the position of the arm and the torques acting on each joint . Body segment anthropometrics and inertias of both upper arm and forearm are obtained from the scientific literature, taking into account the specific body height and weight .
The network has been trained by a Resilient Back Propagation algorithm. Around 200000 epochs are necessary to train ANN2. Details on the implementation of the neural controller can be found in .
Two steps of the non-invasive FES-assisted rehabilitation system for the upper limb have been presented. In synthesis, once acquired a video sequence of an healthy arm movement, the neural controller makes it possible to extract the muscular activations that are necessary to make the synthetic arm execute the presented task.
The video sequence used for training the Snake predictor ANN1 has been acquired at 60 fps and the arm movements have been executed slowly.
After the ANN1 training phase, two video sequences of natural arm movements have been acquired at 30 fps (frame rate commonly used in commercial low costs digital cameras), the proposed NS method has been applied and the close hand and shoulder positions have been estimated over time.
Experimental trials have been performed for assessing the capability of the neural controller to make the synthetic arm execute movements corresponding to those determined by the markerless algorithm. In order to evaluate the performance of the two system blocks, a number of parameters have been extracted from the trajectories of the different movements.
The Cartesian coordinates of the three targets reached by the subject's arm have been expressed in a reference system centred in the shoulder, and the obtained values have been fed to the neural controller. Both the starting and the ending points of the three trajectories have been estimated via the NS algorithm. For each pair of points, ANN2 has been run to generate the neural excitations that enable the biomechanical arm model to execute a movement similar to the video-acquired one.
Indicating with P j = (p xj , p yj ) the horizontal and vertical coordinates of the target point j (j = 1, 2, 3) and with T j = (t xj , t yj ) the trajectory executed leading to the target point j, two measures have been considered as indexes of accuracy of the NS algorithm and the neural controller.
where the estimated target position is indicated with the superscript e and the true one with the superscript t.
where the estimated trajectory is indicated with the superscript e and the reconstructed one with the superscript r.
and the denominator is the distance between the starting and arrival points of the j-th trajectory.
Via-points of the overall trajectory
PE i (cm)
Single segments of the overall trajectory
Curvature of the estimated movement
Curvature of the reconstructed movement
The mean curvature is 1.03 for the movements estimated by NS and 1.06 for the ones reconstructed by the neural controller. These values are in accordance to the results reported in . Therefore, the obtained movements show a good agreement, not only for the final points but also for the trajectory.
The proof of concept of a new non-invasive FES-assisted rehabilitation system for the upper limb has been presented. In the system, called smart FES (sFES), the electrical stimulation, necessary to assist a goal-oriented planar movement of one upper limb, is controlled by a biologically inspired neural controller, a HMI and a healthy arm motion detector. Four main blocks compose the overall system. The first one is dedicated to the markerless analysis of the healthy arm during planar movements from which information regarding the trajectory and the current position of the "healthy teaching arm" is obtained. In the second block a HMI based on gaze tracking and interpretation (not described here) will give information regarding the intention of the subject (which position the arm is going to). Then, the neural controller uses the outputs of the first and the second blocks for generating the specific outputs, which are the stimulations necessary to make the FES-assisted arm execute the movement.
In this paper, the markerless motion estimation method and the neural controller have been presented. The approach has been tested on real data and comparative results between the real, the estimated and the reconstructed target positions have been reported. Experimental results shows mean errors lower that 2 cm and are particularly encouraging for the future development of the system. Moreover, from the comparison of the arm trajectories estimated by the markerless algorithm and the ones reconstructed by the neural controller it emerged that curvature indexes are comparable and in accordance with the values found in literature.
In the future, the other two blocks of sFES will be designed. In particular, a HMI system, based on gaze identification, will process the subject motion intention in order to define the arm trajectory. Moreover, the neural controller outputs will be used to generate the electrical stimuli of the FES system that will make an assisted arm perform rehabilitation exercises.
The fruitful discussions with, and the suggestions of Prof. Maurizio Inghilleri, Università di Roma La Sapienza, are gratefully acknowledged. This work has been partially supported by MiUR (Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca).
- Grill WM, Kirsch RF: Neuroprosthetic applications of electrical stimulation. Assist Technol. 2000, 12: 6-20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW: Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996, 272: 1791-1794.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Craig A, Hancock K, Dickson H: Improving the long-term adjustment of spinal cord injured persons. Spinal Cord. 1999, 37: 345-350.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Craig A, Moses P, Tran Y, McIsaac P, Kirkup L: The effectiveness of a hands-free environmental control system for the profoundly disabled. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002, 83: 1455-1458.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Urton ML, Kohia M, Davis J, Neill MR: Systematic literature review of treatment interventions for upper extremity hemiparesis following stroke. Occup Ther Int. 2007, 14: 11-27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Patton JL, Mussa-Ivaldi FA: Robot-assisted adaptive training: custom force fields for teaching movement patterns. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2004, 51: 636-646.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Medved V: Towards a Virtual Reality-Assisted Movement Diagnostics – an Outline. Robotica. 1994, 12: 55-57.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sussemilch I, Harwin WS: Design of an active arm support for assisting arm movements. Progress in system and robot analysis and control design. Edited by: vy Tzafestas SG, Schmidt G. 1999, London: Springer, 435-444.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sanchez RJ, Liu J, Rao S, Shah P, Smith R, Rahman T, Cramer SC, Bobrow JE, Reinkensmeyer DJ: Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2006, 14: 378-389.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reinkensmeyer DJ, Takahashi CD, Timoszyk WK, Reinkensmeyer AN, Kahn LE: Design of robot assistance for arm movement therapy following stroke. Advanced Robotics. 2000, 14: 625-637.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Popovic MB, Popovic DB, Sinkjaer T, Stefanovic A, Schwirtlich L: Restitution of reaching and grasping promoted by functional electrical therapy. Artif Organs. 2002, 26: 271-275.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Galen SS, Granat MH: Study of the Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) on walking in children undergoing Botulinum Toxin A therapy. Proceedings of the First FESnet Conference: 2–3 September 2002; Glasgow. Edited by: Hunt KJ, Granat MH. 2002, Glasgow: University of Strathclyde, 31-32.Google Scholar
- Liberson WT, Holmquest HJ, Scot D, Dow M: Functional electrotherapy: stimulation of the peroneal nerve synchronized with the swing phase of the gait of hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1961, 42: 101-105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bogataj U, Gros M, Kljajic M, Acimovic R, Malezic M: The Rehabilitation of Gait in Patients with Hemiplegia – a Comparison between Conventional Therapy and Multichannel Functional Electrical-Stimulation Therapy. Physical Therapy. 1995, 75: 490-502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang RY, Yang YR, Tsai MW, Wang WTJ, Chan RC: Effects of functional electric stimulation on upper limb motor function and shoulder range of motion in hemiplegic patients. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 2002, 81 (4): 283-290.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Gritsenko V, Prochazka A: A functional electric stimulation-assisted exercise therapy system for hemiplegic hand function. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2004, 85 (6): 881-885.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Popovic DB, Popovic MB, Sinkjaer T, Stefanovic A, Schwirtlich L: Therapy of paretic arm in hemiplegic subjects augmented with a neural prosthesis: A cross-over study. Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology. 2004, 82: 749-756.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Furuse N, Watanabe T, Ohba S, Futami R, Hoshimiya N, Handa Y: Control-Command Detection for FES using Residual Specific Movements. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of the International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society: August 23–27 1999; Sendai. 1999, Vienna: IFESSGoogle Scholar
- Giuffrida JP, Crago PE: Reciprocal EMG control of elbow extension by FES. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2001, 9 (4): 338-345.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hendricks HT, MJ IJ, de Kroon JR, in 't Groen FA, Zilvold G: Functional electrical stimulation by means of the 'Ness Handmaster Orthosis' in chronic stroke patients: an exploratory study. Clin Rehabil. 2001, 15: 217-220.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Popovic D, Stojanovic A, Pjanovic A, Radosavljevic S, Popovic M, Jovic S, Vulovic D: Clinical evaluation of the Bionic Glove. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1999, 80 (3): 299-304.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Albiol A, Sandoval C, Naranjo V, Mossi JM: Robust motion detector for video surveillance applications. ICIP 2003 Proceedings of the International Conference on Image Processing: September 14–18, 2003; Barcelona. 2003, Tampere: Suvysoft, 2: 379-382.Google Scholar
- Park JS, Lee SR: Human body tracking for human computer intelligent interaction. Entertainment Computing – ICEC 2004. 2004, 3166: 260-265.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Iannizzotto G, La Rosa F, Costanzo C, Lanzafame P: A multimodal perceptual user interface for collaborative environments. Image Analysis and Processing – ICIAP Proceedings. 2005, 3617: 115-122.Google Scholar
- Corazza S, Mundermann L, Chaudhari AM, Demattio T, Cobelli C, Andriacchi TP: A markerless motion capture system to study musculoskeletal biomechanics: Visual hull and simulated annealing approach. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2006, 34: 1019-1029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Poppe R: Vision-based human motion analysis: An overview. Computer Vision and Image Understanding. 2007, 108: 4-18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Grest D, Herzog D, Koch R: Monocular body pose estimation by color histograms and point tracking. Pattern Recognition, Proceedings. 2006, 4174: 576-586.Google Scholar
- Kim MH, Park JB, Ra IH, Joo YH: Hybrid silhouette extraction method for detecting and tracking the human motion. Advances in Natural Computation. 2006, 4222 (Pt 2): 687-695.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim TY, Park JH, Lee SW: Object boundary edge selection for human body tracking using level-of-detail canny edges. Pricai 2004: Trends in Artificial Intelligence, Proceedings. 2004, 3157: 787-796.Google Scholar
- Metaxas DN, Kakadiaris IA: Elastically adaptive deformable models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 2002, 24: 1310-1321.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bhat KS, Seitz SM, Popovic J, Khosla PK: Computing the physical parameters of rigid-body motion from video. Computer Vison – ECCV. 2002, 2350 (Pt 1): 551-565.Google Scholar
- Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D: Snakes – Active Contour Models. International Journal of Computer Vision. 1987, 1: 321-331.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Goffredo M, Schmid M, Conforto S, D'Alessio T: A neural approach to the tracking of human body silhouette. Proceedings of the first international conference on signal and image processing: December 7–9, 2006; Karnataka. Edited by: Nagabhushan P, Kulkarni L. 2006, Delhi: Macmillan IndiaGoogle Scholar
- Kurosawa K, Futami R, Watanabe T, Hoshimiya N: Joint angle control by FES using a feedback error learning controller. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2005, 13 (3): 359-371.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gomi H, Kawato M: Neural-Network Control for a Closed-Loop System Using Feedback-Error-Learning. Neural Networks. 1993, 6: 933-946.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bernabucci I, D'Alessio T, Conforto S, Schmid M: Controlling planar ballistic movements by means of neural system. Proceedings of the X Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing: 31 July – 5 August, 2004. 2001, Graz: EMBECGoogle Scholar
- Popovic MB, Popovic DB, Tomovic R: Control of Arm Movement: Reaching Synergies for Neuroprosthesis with Life-Like Control. Journal of Automatic Control. 2002, 12: 9-15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Virtualdub. 2002, [http://www.virtualdub.org]
- Canny J: A Computational Approach to Edge-Detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. 1986, 8: 679-698.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Massone LLE, Myers JD: The role of plant properties in arm trajectory formation: A neural network study. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part B-Cybernetics. 1996, 26 (5): 719-732.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Contini R, Drillis RJ, Bluestein M: Determination of Body Segment Parameters. Human Factors. 1963, 5: 493-504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Morasso P: Spatial Control of Arm Movements. Experimental Brain Research. 1981, 42: 223-227.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caselli P, Conforto S, Schmid M, Accornero N, D'Alessio T: Difference in sensorimotor adaptation to horizontal and vertical mirror distortions during ballistic arm movements. Human Movement Science. 2006, 25: 310-325.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boessenkool JJ, Nijhof EJ, Erkelens CJ: A comparison of curvatures of left and right hand movements in a simple pointing task. Experimental Brain Research. 1998, 120 (3): 369-376.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.