Skip to main content

Advertisement

Correction to: A suite of automated tools to quantify hand and wrist motor function after cervical spinal cord injury

  • The original article was published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2019 16:48

Correction to: J NeuroEng Rehabil (2019) 16:48

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0518-8

The original article [1] contains several errors which the authors would like to rectify:

  1. 1)

    Figs 3B & 3C contain duplicate data from Fig. 5. The correct version of Fig. 3 can be viewed ahead.

  2. 2)

    The Authors’ contributions section contains a minor typo and should instead read as the following:

    “KMG, SAH, JW, MPK and RLR contributed to experimental design. KMG and SAH wrote the manuscript. KMG and RLR provided engineering. KMG, KR, VW and EG conducted data collection. SAH, MPK, and RLR provided funding. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”

  3. 3)

    Tables 2 & 3 contain minor formatting errors. The correct presentation of both tables can be viewed ahead.

Fig. 3
figure1

Devices for assessing wrist flexion and extension force and range of motion. a Diagram of isometric wrist force module. Red arrows indicate force direction. b Example of single wrist flexion and extension trials from uninjured and cSCI participants. c cSCI participants produce significantly lower wrist flexion and extension forces compared to uninjured controls. d Diagram of the isotonic wrist flexion and extension ROM device showing direction of movement. e Example of single flexion and extension ROM trials performed by uninjured and cSCI participants. f Wrist flexion and extension ROM is significantly reduced in cSCI participants compared to uninjured participants. Individual data is depicted with open circles. Error bars indicate SD. Significant differences were determined by Wilcoxon rank sum tests and are noted as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001

Table 2 Novel system measurement results by participant group (N = 13). CV, coefficient of variation; †Values based on n = 12
Table 3 Test-retest reproducibility results of the novel metrics for cSCI participants (N = 10). MDD, minimally detectable difference; SD20, standard deviation of 20 trials; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; Values based on n = 9

Reference

  1. 1.

    Grasse KM, Hays SA, Rahebi KC, Warren VS, Garcia EA, Wiggington JG, et al. A suite of automated tools to quantify hand and wrist motor function after cervical spinal cord injury. J NeuroEng Rehabil. 2019;16:48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0518-8.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Seth A. Hays.

Additional information

The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0518-8

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grasse, K.M., Hays, S.A., Rahebi, K.C. et al. Correction to: A suite of automated tools to quantify hand and wrist motor function after cervical spinal cord injury. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil 17, 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-019-0627-4

Download citation